Today’s guest is Jennifer Murtazashvili of the University of Pittsburgh. We discuss her book, Informal Order and the State in Afghanistan.

Despite vast efforts to build the state, profound political order in rural Afghanistan is maintained by self-governing, customary organizations. Informal Order and the State in Afghanistan explores the rules governing these organizations to explain why they can provide public goods. Instead of withering during decades of conflict, customary authority adapted to become more responsive and deliberative. Drawing on hundreds of interviews and observations from dozens of villages across Afghanistan, and statistical analysis of nationally representative surveys, Jennifer Brick Murtazashvili demonstrates that such authority enhances citizen support for democracy, enabling the rule of law by providing citizens with a bulwark of defence against predatory state officials. Contrary to conventional wisdom, it shows that ‘traditional’ order does not impede the development of the state because even the most independent-minded communities see a need for a central government – but question its effectiveness when it attempts to rule them directly and without substantive consultation.

Our conversation dives deep into the modern history of Afghanistan, including its 1978 communist revolution and subsequent Soviet invasion.

See More See Less


Leave us a review, comment or subscribe!

Meet the hosts


  • I am working on a business model to get this up off the ground. I need help to find the pit falls that might cause problems. Legal hurtles, practical hurtles, anything. Got an idea, had an idea, it will surely help. Just a few rules. 1. Anybody that would come to the court would have to come to it voluntarily. 2. You must be innocent until proven guilty. 3. Must be a quick and cost effective process. 4. It must be a system without a positive action enforcement process. 5. Must be as accurate as possible.

    Jump to Discussion Post 28 replies
  • The beauty of sites like Reddit is the ability to use throw away accounts. I think it would be cool if we could choose to post comments, and create discussions anonymously. This could open the doors for people to start taboo discussions without fear that some day people could link there thoughts to there name. You would still need to be a paid member to post as anon. Maybe this isn’t what is going for, or maybe it’s just what it needs. Any thoughts?

    Jump to Discussion Post 11 replies
  • Is it possible to create a site that is just for members, i.e., one not indexed for the public? If not, it’s a feature suggestion.

    Jump to Discussion Post 3 replies
  • I am looking for any and all Idaho Libertarians.  I am the SFL CC here and I am looking for people who might be looking for others like themselves.  You aren’t crazy and you aren’t alone.  Private message me or respond here.

    Jump to Discussion Post 1 reply