Description

The FBI planted a spy in the Trump campaign?

Turns out that claim is true. But the story is so much deeper than that. Who that spy has turned out to be, is a man with CIA connections who has inserted himself into presidential campaigns before.

This is a Reality Check you won’t get anywhere else.

Reality Check with Ben Swann is a twice-weekly show that takes on systems that disenfranchises people, breaking through narratives created by press releases and spin doctors. We give people a voice by holding government, corporations and special interests accountable.

Also follow me here:

Facebook – www.facebook.com/BenSwannRealityCheck

YouTube – www.youtube.com/channel/UC1h3bqESVdqkwm123Ce4ZmA

Twitter – twitter.com/BenSwann_

Instagram – www.instagram.com/BenSwann_

Newsletter signup – truthinmedia.com/newsletter-signup/

See More See Less

Subscribe

Leave us a review, comment or subscribe!

Meet the hosts

Ben Swann has spent 18 years working as a journalist in broadcast news, behind and in front of the camera. Swann began his journalism career in El Paso, Texas as a news photographer, quickly working his way up to prime time anchor.  Along the way, Swann became a two time Emmy Award winner and two time recipient of the Edward R. Murrow Award. Covering Mexico’s drug war, Ben Swann discovered the national media was not reporting the truth of what was actually happening in Mexico’s drug war or the problems associated with the failed “War on Drugs” in the United States.   In 2010, Ben moved north to Cincinnati, Ohio, earning the prime time anchor seat at FOX 19 and soon became the producer/anchor of a viral segment titled “Reality Check.”  Covering the 2012 Republican Presidential primary, Swann confronted problems in the American electoral process, the stranglehold of America’s two party system and the suppression of voters’ choices by mainstream media. During this time, Swann became the first journalist in the nation to take on President Barack Obama face to face regarding the Constitutionality of his “kill list” and is the only journalist to confront Mitt Romney about the railroading of duly elected delegates during the 2012 Republican National Convention.  Swann’s bold approach created an internet firestorm strong enough for Swann to venture from his position as anchor at FOX 19 in Cincinnati, launching his own independent platform. Upon establishing the Truth In Media Project at BenSwann.com in June of 2013, Swann’s brand met immediate success. Swann launched the Truth in Media project through crowdfunding and has created two seasons of “Truth in Media” videos that examined subjects such as the truth behind cannabis and CBD oil, the origin of ISIS, the roots of police militarization and more. These videos have millions of combined views online. Ben Swann is now the industry leader for independent journalists, shattering the “Left vs. Right” paradigm, with a sharp focus on restoring Truth In Media. With over 400,000 combined Facebook followers, 53,000 YouTube subscribers, and monthly pageviews surpassing 2 million per month, Swann’s impact and influence is undeniable. In May of 2015, Benswann.com expanded its role as a disruptive force in American media and made the transition to TruthinMedia.com, partnering with even more voices across the political spectrum. Following a hiatus from Truth In Media and Reality Check, Swann has revived both with thanks to an exclusive sponsorship from the network of Dash, a digital currency system. Dash’s revolutionary, decentralized network harmonizes with Swann’s longstanding commitment to objective and independent reporting. With this historic partnership, Swann, Truth In Media and Reality Check are continuing to speak truth to power. 

discussions

  •   Wow these scammers are really stepping it up a notch. I hope this undermines confidence in government. They make threats just the way a government would.     Return-Path: <[email protected]> X-Original-To: Delivered-To: Received: from ogo01.cncm.ne.jp (ogo01.cncm.ne.jp [202.228.249.15]) by  (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EAB20271 for <>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 09:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from drop04.cncm.ne.jp (mail.cncm.ne.jp [202.228.249.10]) by ogo01.cncm.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E88917DF9 for <>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:32:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from relay04.cncm.ne.jp (unknown [202.228.249.10]) by drop04.cncm.ne.jp (unknown) with ESMTP id 8169C9E2DF for <>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:32:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from aspam12.cncm.ne.jp (unknown [202.228.249.27]) by relay04.cncm.ne.jp (unknown) with ESMTP id 73685A221A for <>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:32:29 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <[email protected]> Received: from mail.cncm.ne.jp (HELO mail05.cncm.ne.jp) ([202.228.249.10]) by aspam12.cncm.ne.jp with ESMTP; 25 Dec 2014 18:32:29 +0900 Received: from User (unknown [114.134.136.142]) by mail05.cncm.ne.jp (unknown) with SMTP id 0F6124B2A1; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:32:01 +0900 (JST) Reply-To: <[email protected]> From: “AGENT MARK GIULIANO”<[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: RE: FROM THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 10:32:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=”Windows-1251” Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SA-Poll-Id: 1419500162751..com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPMessage X-SA-USERIDNR: 3497508 Received-SPF: fail(ic.fbi.gov: domain of ic.fbi.gov does not designate 202.228.249.15 as permitted sender) X-SA-MPREASON: SPF Failed – Preference is Unverified  

    Jump to Discussion Post 0 replies
  • Hi everyone, We could all use a good laugh these days, so just thought I’d pass along one of our new animated videos. For Liberty, The Wry Guys

    Jump to Discussion Post 0 replies
  • When J. K. Rowling mentioned a petition to ban Donald Trump from the UK, the audience at the PEN Literary Gala applauded. But unlike much of the left, she knows that taking away freedom of speech threatens everyone, including her, and she rebuked the people who clapped. “Just a moment: Now, I find almost everything that Mr. Trump says objectionable. I consider him offensive and bigoted. But he has my full support to come to my country and be offensive and bigoted there. His freedom to speak protects my freedom to call him a bigot.” The people who applauded were doubtless the same ones who objected to PEN’s free speech award to Charlie Hebdo. While they’re not likely to be convinced by any argument, she may have gotten others to think about the danger in today’s spreading hostility to free speech. That’s what counts.

    Jump to Discussion Post 0 replies
  • It took me a while to understand that Trumpism isn’t really about the issues. Not even the issues of anti-immigration and protectionism. It’s about the Chosen One, the Great Leader, the Messiah. When people think things have gone badly wrong, they often turn to someone who will set them right by taking command. The outrageous things he does have only increased his popularity. He boasts, “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters.” When this mentality takes hold, there is no right or wrong for the Leader. When he does outrageous things, that merely proves nothing will stand in the way of his will. Caesar, Napoleon, Lenin, Hitler, Castro, Khomeini: They’ve all known the trick of harnessing the tribalist mindset. The specifics they offered didn’t matter so much as the promise that nothing would stand in their way. They can’t do anything horrible enough to turn people against them, except for failing. Telling Trumpists that he’ll do horrible things or that his policies will hurt everyone is beside the point. They expect him to “make America great again” by sheer force of authority.

    Jump to Discussion Post 1 reply
  • Over the past five months or so, I admit I’ve been intrigued—indeed, perhaps obsessed—with the American elections. More specifically, I’ve been fascinated by the Trump phenomenon and by the stunning hordes of people that either support him and hate him. The time I’ve spent learning about American Democracy has made me realize that my previous opposition to statism as a whole, as well as my rejection of voting on principle, was founded on abstract and philosophical discussion alone. I had an utter lack of experience and interest in politics. Throughout my whole life, the political process has seemed hopelessly corrupt and out of reach. It was easy for me to conclude that voting was hopelessly pointless and probably immoral. Today my views have changed, not much, but enough that I feel compelled to talk about my thoughts and not just keep them to myself. This is an exploration of a self-defense case for voting that is consistent with Voluntaryist principles, as well as a discussion on the potential merits of voting for Donald Trump to advance the cause of liberty. Before I make that case however, let me lay down two essential facts that have propelled me to this point. The Voluntaryst Self Defense Case for Voting Trump

    Jump to Discussion Post 3 replies