Description

The revelations about the FBI infiltrating the 2016 Trump campaign leads us to one simple conclusion – we still have COINTELPRO today! COINTELPRO was a secret FBI program ran during the 1960s that worked to infiltrate, surveil, and disrupt various political movements at the time. Although the program was “officially” ended in 1971, there are signs that the program has reemerged in modern times.

When looking at stories today, we can connect the dots back in not too distant memory. The FBI is using national security letters in order to bypass judicial oversight. The Patriot Act enables the FBI to more or less, sign their own warrants if their investigation pertains to national security, but since that power has been given to the FBI, it has been wildly abused. There is no judicial check on executive power.

This is a powerful moment and we should all think about this. In order to “keep us safe”, Congress granted the executive branch more power. The bill, signed by President George W Bush was later used as a tool by the opposition party to target a Presidential candidate, and even an acting President. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

8 signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump’s campaign

See More See Less

Subscribe

Leave us a review, comment or subscribe!

Meet the hosts

I am the CEO of Preuss Media LLC as well as a 20-something political commentator, blogger, talker, musician, bookworm, and weight lifter. Although lacking a formal college degree (something I boast about), my strange brain contains a wealth of knowledge of economics, political science, and philosophy.

discussions

  •   Wow these scammers are really stepping it up a notch. I hope this undermines confidence in government. They make threats just the way a government would.     Return-Path: <[email protected]> X-Original-To: Delivered-To: Received: from ogo01.cncm.ne.jp (ogo01.cncm.ne.jp [202.228.249.15]) by  (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EAB20271 for <>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 09:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from drop04.cncm.ne.jp (mail.cncm.ne.jp [202.228.249.10]) by ogo01.cncm.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E88917DF9 for <>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:32:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from relay04.cncm.ne.jp (unknown [202.228.249.10]) by drop04.cncm.ne.jp (unknown) with ESMTP id 8169C9E2DF for <>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:32:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from aspam12.cncm.ne.jp (unknown [202.228.249.27]) by relay04.cncm.ne.jp (unknown) with ESMTP id 73685A221A for <>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:32:29 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <[email protected]> Received: from mail.cncm.ne.jp (HELO mail05.cncm.ne.jp) ([202.228.249.10]) by aspam12.cncm.ne.jp with ESMTP; 25 Dec 2014 18:32:29 +0900 Received: from User (unknown [114.134.136.142]) by mail05.cncm.ne.jp (unknown) with SMTP id 0F6124B2A1; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:32:01 +0900 (JST) Reply-To: <[email protected]> From: “AGENT MARK GIULIANO”<[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: RE: FROM THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 10:32:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=”Windows-1251” Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SA-Poll-Id: 1419500162751..com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPMessage X-SA-USERIDNR: 3497508 Received-SPF: fail(ic.fbi.gov: domain of ic.fbi.gov does not designate 202.228.249.15 as permitted sender) X-SA-MPREASON: SPF Failed – Preference is Unverified  

    Jump to Discussion Post 0 replies
  • Hi everyone, We could all use a good laugh these days, so just thought I’d pass along one of our new animated videos. For Liberty, The Wry Guys

    Jump to Discussion Post 0 replies
  • When J. K. Rowling mentioned a petition to ban Donald Trump from the UK, the audience at the PEN Literary Gala applauded. But unlike much of the left, she knows that taking away freedom of speech threatens everyone, including her, and she rebuked the people who clapped. “Just a moment: Now, I find almost everything that Mr. Trump says objectionable. I consider him offensive and bigoted. But he has my full support to come to my country and be offensive and bigoted there. His freedom to speak protects my freedom to call him a bigot.” The people who applauded were doubtless the same ones who objected to PEN’s free speech award to Charlie Hebdo. While they’re not likely to be convinced by any argument, she may have gotten others to think about the danger in today’s spreading hostility to free speech. That’s what counts.

    Jump to Discussion Post 0 replies
  • It took me a while to understand that Trumpism isn’t really about the issues. Not even the issues of anti-immigration and protectionism. It’s about the Chosen One, the Great Leader, the Messiah. When people think things have gone badly wrong, they often turn to someone who will set them right by taking command. The outrageous things he does have only increased his popularity. He boasts, “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters.” When this mentality takes hold, there is no right or wrong for the Leader. When he does outrageous things, that merely proves nothing will stand in the way of his will. Caesar, Napoleon, Lenin, Hitler, Castro, Khomeini: They’ve all known the trick of harnessing the tribalist mindset. The specifics they offered didn’t matter so much as the promise that nothing would stand in their way. They can’t do anything horrible enough to turn people against them, except for failing. Telling Trumpists that he’ll do horrible things or that his policies will hurt everyone is beside the point. They expect him to “make America great again” by sheer force of authority.

    Jump to Discussion Post 1 reply
  • Over the past five months or so, I admit I’ve been intrigued—indeed, perhaps obsessed—with the American elections. More specifically, I’ve been fascinated by the Trump phenomenon and by the stunning hordes of people that either support him and hate him. The time I’ve spent learning about American Democracy has made me realize that my previous opposition to statism as a whole, as well as my rejection of voting on principle, was founded on abstract and philosophical discussion alone. I had an utter lack of experience and interest in politics. Throughout my whole life, the political process has seemed hopelessly corrupt and out of reach. It was easy for me to conclude that voting was hopelessly pointless and probably immoral. Today my views have changed, not much, but enough that I feel compelled to talk about my thoughts and not just keep them to myself. This is an exploration of a self-defense case for voting that is consistent with Voluntaryist principles, as well as a discussion on the potential merits of voting for Donald Trump to advance the cause of liberty. Before I make that case however, let me lay down two essential facts that have propelled me to this point. The Voluntaryst Self Defense Case for Voting Trump

    Jump to Discussion Post 3 replies