The guys witness Kobe Bryant being removed from a film festival due to rape allegations against him in 2003, Elizabeth Warren’s DNA test, and memes causing obesity. Justin also discusses The Replacements from 2000.

See More See Less


Leave us a review, comment or subscribe!

Meet the hosts


  • California is 1 of the 4 states that claims “dried blood samples” (DBS) taken during the birth screening process become property of the state. Below is the source that I would encourage all current parents and any soon to be, to read and understand what the laws are in your state about blood sample retention. For parents who did not know about this may be able to “request” the samples to be destroyed but you will need to confirm this yourself. I’m not the most knowledgeable person on this subject but I am willing to share my experiences with anyone who has any questions. Please help me get this information out there: American Journal of Pediatrics State Laws Regarding the Retention and Use of Residual Newborn Screening Blood Samples Source: Full PDF: Abstract BACKGROUND: After newborn screening has been completed, many states retain residual newborn screening dried blood samples for various purposes, including program evaluation, quality assurance, and biomedical research. The extent to which states possess legal authority to retain residual dried blood samples (DBS) and use them for purposes unrelated to newborn screening is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate state laws regarding the retention and use of DBS. METHODS: State statutes and regulations related to newborn screening of all 50 states plus the District of Columbia were accessed online between November 2008 and December 2009 and reviewed by 2 independent reviewers to determine the extent to which the retention and use of DBS were addressed. RESULTS: The retention or use of DBS has not been addressed in 18 states. In 4 states, DBS becomes state property. Eight states require that parents be provided information regarding the retention of DBS. Parents in 5 states may request the destruction of their child’s residual sample. Parental consent is required under certain circumstances to release DBS for research in 6 states. One state prohibits DBS from being used for research purposes. CONCLUSIONS: States have wide variability in their policies regarding the retention and use of DBS. Many states have not addressed key issues, and some states that retain DBS may be acting outside the scope of their legal authority. The lack of transparency on the part of states in retaining DBS may undermine public trust in state newborn screening programs and the research enterprise.

    Jump to Discussion Post 5 replies
  • Gentlemen, that age old question concerning of male style about how we hold up our trousers arises again. I myself frequently don suspenders, having both clip on and buttoned. Today’s men, however, nearly always sport a belt even though the leather dress belt was only a recent staple compared to suspenders. Please comment your preference.

    Jump to Discussion Post 2 replies