There are 3 issues I have taken with the philosophy that no one has addressed
1st is worker protections it is a known fact that during the 1800s that most company’s found it cheaper to put down strikes violently than pay workers better and improve conditions. The most notable was the Carnegie steel strike what is going to prevent this? I have never seen this issue addressed.
2nd is company secrecy. It mostly applys to food and drugs but to other industry’s as well. Rather than letting the blame for a bad product fall on them they are going to want the plausible deniability that something went bad somewhere else in the chain such as poor storage in transit to the store. They will have no interest in a outside agency coming in and poking around if they can avoid it.
3rd is something I have heard around to the effect to the more forms of money the better. this makes it possible for a company to pay its workers in something that is worthless everywhere other than company owned stores thus enslaving workers by not being able to leave for other work do to an inability to pay for anything anywhere else.
My solution to this is a reintroduction of unions. Not the state backed powerhouses we see today but simple negotiators of work contracts. I feel this solves all 3 issues. Worker protection is self explanatory and workers have an interest in keeping a good reputation in order to get more work so mandating proper labeling and testing is a logical part of the contract it also ensures the workers are payed in something they can use. However I do not feel that unions are part of the ancap philosophy. Identify as a mutualist because I feel it solves these issues however correct me if I am wrong and talk about solutions to these issues.