Jeffrey Tucker – Liberty Classics: Economics of Illusion With Jeffrey Tucker

Related Discussions

  • Moritz Bierling

    How to survive Keynesian Economics in University

    This will be a general discussion to share tips and tricks to survive conventional Keynesian Economics Lessons in university.

    Jump to Discussion Post 4 replies
  • Michael R. E. Sanders

    Fascism is just another form of socialism

    Jeffrey Tucker wrote in pertinent part “You can choose the socialist who wants to wreck the world in one way, or the fascist who wants to wreck the world in another way.” Since fascism is just another form of socialism, is Mr. Tucker arguing  “you can choose the socialist who wants to wreck the world in one way, or the socialist who wants to wreck the world in another way?

    Jump to Discussion Post 36 replies
  • Bruce Koerber

    How Extensive Is The Depravity In Socialism?

    A key point made by Fredrich Hayek in The University of Chicago Law Review (Spring 1949) is when he refers to the philosopher as the prince of the intellectuals. To understand this we have to separate ourselves from socialism. A philosopher within socialism is functionally no more (due to its incongruence with the human spirit) a prince than any other socialist, just a more decorated one. For Hayek’s statement to be true – ‘a philosopher is the prince of the intellectuals’ – there has to be freedom of the human spirit. The entrepreneurial spirit that is alert to human potential will tend to be philosophic. Here is an analogy: Entrepreneurs are alert to the human needs and the resources necessary to meet those needs – they are the driving force of the economy. In like manner philosophers alert to human potential lay the groundwork necessary for the advancement of civilization. Business people of all facets of commerce dutifully compete to get what the entrepreneurs discovered and all products and services to the consumers. In like manner the intellectuals diligently find ways to distribute this new philosophic information and information in general to human minds. Socialism is not only a system of depravity economically but ineludibly it is a system of shackled intellectual and philosophic expressiveness.

    Jump to Discussion Post 0 replies
  • Bruce Koerber

    It Should Be Easy To Undo Socialism.

    It would be easy to undo socialism if: 1. the politicians stopped lying, that is , if the politicians who believe in socialism stop pretending that they are not socialists, 2. the media exposed the incongruencies and the history of oppression and the failure of socialism, 3. Marx and Keynes were seen properly, as ego-driven charlatans, and finally, if: 4. people were educated about classical liberalism. Headway is being made in step #4 which may cause improvements in #1, #2, and #3.

    Jump to Discussion Post 3 replies
  • starrychloe

    The Road to Serfdom, In Cartoons

    Jump to Discussion Post 3 replies


Join Jeffrey Tucker for another show about the world’s best liberty literature! This week he’ll be chatting about Economics of Illusion by L. Albert Hahn.

The beautiful thing about Hahn’s book is how liberating it is. Keynesian economics was refuted before it began? Yes indeed. This one point stands the whole history of ideas of the 20th century on its head. The widely held view, then and now, is that Keynes’s economics were the “new economics”; nothing like this theory had ever been advanced and he was a singular mind in the history of ideas. But Hahn actually shows that he did nothing but regurgitate old fallacies and apply new terminological razzle-dazzle to them.

See More See Less